+6

In contrast to what those from the Sunny Muslims have been doing in Iraq, is what I have heard since childhood about the fighters from the Kurds, who are majority Sunny, in the North of Iraq Itself. I never heard any talk about them attacking civilians or people taking precautions that they might do that. In fact because of what I experienced there, I feel surprised and in big doubts every time I hear Turkey accusing its Kurds of doing such things.

+5

And what about the connections to all those suicide bombers? Do those in the leadership of Iraq know how much further connections to prosecute all those who in anyway helped the attacker could have been extracted from those attacks in countries like here ?

But since democracy means the rule of the law, they make sure that they add whatever necessary laws first. It is also very important to notice that in matters like this in countries like here laws target helping the person whether or not such help had facilitated the attack. For example, they talk about prosecuting material support to terrorists, the whole person, not just his terrorism activity. In other words, if you give somebody you know he is going to make or help in making such attack a year from now a cup of water to drink today then you could get prosecuted for it. The same thing applies to you for anyone who help you in anything knowing that you are going to help that attacker, and so on. You see how that could be extended.

      

+4

The point of the preceding post is that if you are not ready to deal with the moral responsibility of balancing the rights of people then you probably shouldn't seek leadership. Otherwise, even asking somebody for his ID to catch a criminal from among a group of people involves some level of encroaching on the right of that person if he is not that criminal.   

+3

Iraq was not dropped from the sky separately from the rest of humanity. It could have run its democratic system like here but the Saudis messed up the minds of the genius presidents of this country and those messed up the internal system of those in the Shia leadership in Iraq. The later also could not counter that with a vision that may come with experiencing how and where democracies like here draw the lines at least because most lack such experience. Notice for example that the strategy of allowing no cars during election days which seems to have led to the success of all those elections had started during the time of Prime Minister Ayad Allawi who had lived in the United Kingdom before that. Otherwise others may have not even seen to draw a line there.

+2

Do those in the leadership of Iraq know what could happen if attacks like these happen here or in other western democracies like the way they happen in their country? Assuming we do not get thrown in concentration camps, you could see people made to walk out not just without cars to avoid car bombs but entirely naked. 

A governor here once issued an order allowing shooting people during a chaos after a natural disaster if they seen looting. So how about a chaos that takes the lives of people?

Those attacks generally always target the Shia. We have also seen with the occupation of Sunny provinces and cities how much that suggested cooperation with the like of ISIS there to the level of making thinking otherwise looks like a joke. The forces there not only retreated but one can hardly miss that their intention was to leave the weapons for ISIS and even doing it repeatedly like what happen in, I think, Ramadi. Have anyone heard of those jokes getting anywhere close to being sufficiently prosecuted?  

What should be done with those attacks there? Of course, you cannot take the innocent for the guilt of the criminal, and the Shia have shown some of the highest levels of self restriction in history of humanity in that regard . I have not heard about any majority tolerating that much from a minority and despite being in power. However their efforts to prevent those attacks and hold those who commit them responsible was a shame compared to what could have happened in western democracies. 

For starter, concerning the level of investigation , I doubt very much that the crime scene investigation that happens after such attacks there is anywhere close to those countries. Here, for example with a car bomb, they could have used everything left of that car to trace back where it came from then arrested and brought criminal charges on those with probable association in the criminal act no matter how far were their roles in doing that. Is there anything like this going on in Iraq? You hear a car bomb as if the car was just dropped from the sky or that ISIS has its own manufacturing that makes new cars with no history associated with them.  If they cant do such level of investigation themselves how about hiring the experts who could do that from places like here? I don't care a bit about pride when the price is the blood of the innocent. If it were me I could have also tagged various parts under the hood and similar areas of every car in a way that makes it very low probability that at least on of those tags will be found if it get used as a bombing car. The effort in doing that is nothing compared to the waiting they go here everyday in airports for inspections before travelling on a plane.    

+1

Here we go again with bombing and suicide attacks targeting Shia civilians in Iraq.Have you ever heard about the Shia, even when they are oppressed, intentionally attacking Sunny civilians?   

This tolerated discrimination

Let's make it clear again what is going on in front of the world in Yemen so that no one can deny this middle age's like discrimination stigma in the future. The Saudi government is allowed to go outside its border to attack a group of people in another country without being threatened in any way just because it does not like them .  

Clearly I am not with those rebels in Yemen if they are not for building a democratic system. But it is not the establishment of a democracy the Saudi government wants there.