Reason for the FBI's claim

Why would the FBI wants to cooperate with making that false claim of Sony's hacking by the dictatorship of North Korea? I have strong belief that it was at least partly a service for the hedge fund guy I am suing and his connections.  I think that the FBI was helping the hedge fund guy in showing me how high he can go and still cause the corrupt compliance he wants so that I would have less expectations for the Supreme Court to act differently than the lower two Federal Courts. I think that whether he knows or not, the President was used for that purpose. I also wouldn't be surprised to know that some talk against the FBI's claim that preceded my writing about the issue was pushed by the hedge fund guy himself  to be more confident that I can see through that claim.   

The antisemitism in the common use of "antisemitism"

It seems as if after ignoring the descendants of Ismail as descendants of Abraham ,which is at least biologically wrong even if  you believe according to your religion that the man who faced being thrown in fire and done all what he did for his faith couldn't control himself not to commit adultery to have a son, some in the western world thought why not expand on that denial in depth and width  by limiting the  use of the term "antisemitic" to only one subgroup excluding and denying the existence of the rest of the group to the time of Noah.    

Yesterday CBS aired this report explaining why the FBI accused North Korea with the hacking of Sony.

Not only that would require believing in the FBI's honesty in defending an investigation where its honesty could have been in question, the stated claim by itself seems venerable. According to that claim North Korea has been trying to hack American companies long before the attack on Sony. Why then didn't we hear about similar things like this one before? With all the less than pleasing things that were going on around throughout all that time  why didn't it try to at least take some revenge by messing things like it did in this hacking? Same question also applies to other western countries. It is not like it has a good relation with any of them. That must be some quite self control by a system run by the whims of a dictatorship coming from a young man who, according to the news, even obligated other young men in his country to have the same hair cut as his.

Now, we have also to continue to the conflicting assumption that all that self control and self hiding and avoidance of suspension by that dictatorship evaporated in this Sony hacking when things apparently point  only to it as the one with a motive and for the sake of a movie.    

Although one may be tempted to generalize because of the proximity,it is amazing how the small cities I live in here are different from the main big one despite being so close to it. In a few years these two cities (the one I live in and the other one between it and the big city) showed me shameless and aggressive discriminating behavior that I did not experience at that level in the main city despite living there much longer. If one occasionally experience a discrimination and sick level of hatred in that big city, one can hardly go out and do even a little task without experiencing that in a much more obvious way. I may in the future provide specific example about the level of discrimination here. However, my main intention here is to point out the difference between the big city and those two small cities close to it. This also may provide some answer to what I used to wonder about in seeing how the population of big cities grows much faster than that of the small ones surrounding it.    

This recent hacking or messing with military and defense department related data was -you guessed it- also framed on other entities . It is and Sony's in addition to the preceding ones were most probably were all originated ,not necessarily in the technical sense, from the same entity here.

No one needs to take into account the alleged hacking of  North Korea to Sony to see how bad that dictator is. Its significance here is less than that of adding a traffic ticket violation to a murder trial.

Here, on the other hand, we are already swimming in an ocean of corruption and we do not need to add to it corruption at this level with these kind of issues. It is a question of corruption not inelegance and the FBI can hardly be seen as anywhere  near being really misled by decoys here.

The allegation do not fit to a level that calls badly for a very deep, honest and comprehensive real investigation to the investigation itself that led to that conclusion probably for the service of someone trying to show that he can get corruption help anywhere he wants.