(continuing from the post below)

While even if the rebels in Yemen are seeking to take control of the country there is nothing to support the believe that the resulted dictatorship will be worse than that in Saudi Arabia or other gulf states, that still does not justify for the rebels taking away the rights of those living with them in the same country if their intention is to build such a dictatorship.

If , on the other hand, their intention is to secure their own voting rights and a basic set of protected rights that also apply to everybody else then they should try to better explain their position to the world and demand guarantee and protection for such rights from the big democratic countries in the world and declare readiness to give away cities they took over if those countries are ready to provide such guarantee and answer related fears. Although ,in addition to failing in showing them attacking or encroaching on other countries, the Saudi government also failed to show any level of criminality and committing of atrocities in them like those which happened in Iraq or Syria, the rebels in Yemen should moreover deny the Saudi government the opportunity to equate them with the like of those in Iraq who already got those rights but resort or condone violent resistance because of  refusal or reluctance to  accept the empowerment to the ruling of the majority in a democratic system, if it is not the case.

I guess all sides claim seeking just cause.Yet, there is still fighting going on. This and other democratic countries, for their part, can declare the intention to build a democratic just system of equal voting rights with protection for basic rights like those provided by the constitution of this country to everybody there then see who would refuse to comply with that despite providing the required guarantee and protection.

The guy in the White House also needs to know that making the super power he leads stands with a country attacking a group in another country based on a self defense claim as weak as the one he is accepting or condoning from the Saudi government for its attack in Yemen is far from being a positive example against chaos in the world. I cant see what forces him to use such path if he is seeking justice and democracy for the people in Yemen.

In addition, I would be even more careful before I ignore complaints of suffering injustice or inequality from people suffer from indiscriminate suicidal or car bombing attacks and still resist to respond the same way. That is especially true when things are contested between them and the like of the Saudi government and those working for it inside Yemen. Did this administration make sure that those rebels are revolting despite the existence of equal voting rights and a constitution guaranteeing basic rights or real path to those aims before agreeing to let the Saudi government corner them? Did trusted entities oversight anything existing of that or are we supposed to trust the Saudi government on it despite its proven extreme discrimination and singling out for the Shia?

The Saudi's Dangerous Precedence

I just want to know, with the world allowing the Saudi government to do what it is doing in Yemen, is the world going to accept that any country attacks whomever it wants in another based on claims of self defense and danger that lack support by evidence, history, or even being rationally explainable to this level? And if that is not enough we actually have signs adding to the lack of rationality in that claim with the relatively recent history of the same attacking country involving itself in Bahrain and claiming a danger from peaceful protesting demanding democracy in that small country.      

Continuing from the post below

And in case having the man in that situation acts as if he was in need to point out being shot himself does not reflect badly enough on the environment, you also can hear the man proceeding after that to complain about his breath with one of the cops responding with "F*** your breath".

It is not possible to see from the video the reaction of that reserve cop who pulled his gun instead of a taser and shot that man in Tulsa . However, based on what I hear in that video it seems as if I could accidentally step on the foot of a person but still react in a way showing how shocked and horrified I am by what I did more than that. Without knowing what happened, it sounds that one could think that the shooting guy was reacting for something like accidentally dropping and damaging a cell phone, and probably not an expensive one, of one of his partners.